Change in Spinopelvic Parameters Before and After Lumbar Disc Herniation Surgery

Authors

  • Emine Dagistan Department of Radiology, Abant Izzet Baysal University Medical School, Bolu, Türkİye
  • Melike Elif Kalfaoglu Department of Radiology, Abant Izzet Baysal University Medical School, Bolu, Türkİye
  • Yasar Dagistan Department of Radiology, Abant Izzet Baysal University Medical School, Bolu, Türkİye
  • Caner Cicek Department of Neurosurgery, Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University, Zonguldak, Türkİye

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64229/r08fx795

Keywords:

Lumbar disc herniation, Spinopelvic parameters, Microdiscectomy

Abstract

Background: Sagittal balance depends on the interaction between lumbar alignment and spinopelvic parameters such as lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), and pelvic incidence (PI). Although these parameters are well described in deformity surgery, their early and mid-term postoperative behavior in lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is not clearly defined. This study evaluated temporal changes in LL, PT, SS, and PI after single-level microdiscectomy at postoperative day 15 and at 1, 3, and 6 months. Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent single-level microdiscectomy (L4-L5 or L5-S1) for radiologically confirmed LDH between 2019 and 2021. Standardized standing lateral radiographs were obtained preoperatively and at each postoperative visit. LL, PT, SS, and PI were independently measured by two radiologists (interobserver reliability ICC > 0.90). Pain severity was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Temporal changes were analyzed using paired comparisons with 95% confidence intervals. Results: PT, PI, and SS demonstrated significant early reductions that continued throughout follow-up (p < 0.05). LL increased gradually and reached significance at 6 months (p < 0.001). VAS scores decreased markedly at all postoperative time points (p < 0.001), indicating substantial and sustained pain improvement. Conclusion: In patients with clinically successful microdiscectomy, PT, SS, and PI showed early postoperative changes consistent with normalization of pain-related posture rather than true structural modification. LL showed a delayed but statistically significant increase by 6 months, which may be related to gradual recovery of muscular and postural function. These findings outline typical radiographic evolution after microdiscectomy and may help clinicians distinguish expected postoperative alignment changes from pathological deviations.

References

[1]Matsui H, Terahata N, Tsuji H, Hirano N, Naruse Y. Familial predisposition and clustering for juvenile lumbar disc herniation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1992, 17(11), 1323-1328. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199211000-00011

[2]Urban JP, Smith S, Fairbank JC. Nutrition of the intervertebral disc. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2004, 29(23), 2700-2709. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000146499.97948.52

[3]Raj PP. Intervertebral disc: Anatomy-physiology-pathophysiology-treatment. Pain Practice, 2008, 8(1), 18-44. DOI: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2007.00171.x

[4]Roberts S, Evans H, Trivedi J, Menage J. Histology and pathology of the human intervertebral disc. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 2006, 88 Suppl 2, 10-14. DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.f.00019

[5]Gottfried ON, Daubs MD, Patel AA, Dailey AT, Brodke DS. Spinopelvic parameters in postfusion flatback deformity patients. Spine Journal, 2009, 9(8), 639-647. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.04.008

[6]Booth KC, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Baldus CR, Blanke KM. Complications and predictive factors for the successful treatment of flatback deformity (fixed sagittal imbalance). Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1999, 24(16), 1712-1720. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199908150-00013

[7]Farcy JP, Schwab FJ. Management of flatback and related kyphotic decompensation syndromes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1997, 22(20), 2452-2457. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199710150-00025

[8]Wiggins GC, Ondra SL, Shaffrey CI. Management of iatrogenic flat-back syndrome. Neurosurgical Focus, 2003, 15(3), E8. DOI: 10.3171/foc.2003.15.3.8

[9]Pan YH, Wan D, Wang Q, Shen WJ, Yang JR, Wang ZY, et al. Association of spinal-pelvic parameters with recurrence of lumbar disc herniation after endoscopic surgery: A retrospective case-control study. European Spine Journal, 2024, 33(2), 444-452. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-08073-w

[10]Löchel J, Hanisch M, Bürger J, Labbus K, Zahn R. Association of spinopelvic anatomy with the level of lumbar disc herniation. Bioengineering (Basel), 2025, 12(9). DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering12090993

[11]Lu DC, Chou D. Flatback syndrome. Neurosurgery Clinics of North America, 2007, 18(2), 289-294. DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2007.01.007

[12]Legaye J, Duval-Beaupère G, Hecquet J, Marty C. Pelvic incidence: A fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. European Spine Journal, 1998, 7(2), 99-103. DOI: 10.1007/s005860050038

[13]Celestre PC, Dimar JR, 2nd, Glassman SD. Spinopelvic parameters: Lumbar lordosis, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, and sacral slope: What does a spine surgeon need to know to plan a lumbar deformity correction? Neurosurgery Clinics of North America, 2018, 29(3), 323-329. DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2018.03.003

[14]Kadono N, Tsuchiya K, Uematsu A, Kamoshita H, Kiryu K, Hortobágyi T, et al. A japanese stretching intervention can modify lumbar lordosis curvature. Clinical Spine Surgery, 2017, 30(7), 297-300. DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000000247

[15]Nakano S, Inoue M, Takahashi H, Kubota G, Saito J, Norimoto M, et al. Effects of the difference between lumbar lordosis in the supine and standing positions on the clinical outcomes of decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Journal of Neurosurgery, 2022, 36(4), 542-548. DOI: 10.3171/2021.7.spine21413

[16]Chang HS. Influence of lumbar lordosis on the outcome of decompression surgery for lumbar canal stenosis. World Neurosurgery, 2018, 109, e684-e690. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.10.055

[17]Liang C, Sun J, Cui X, Jiang Z, Zhang W, Li T. Spinal sagittal imbalance in patients with lumbar disc herniation: Its spinopelvic characteristics, strength changes of the spinal musculature and natural history after lumbar discectomy. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2016, 17, 305. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-016-1164-y

[18]Zhang ZF, Qi DB, Wang TH, Wang CG, Wang Z, Wang Y, et al. Association of sagittal spinopelvic realignment with correction in lower lumbar lordosis after surgical treatment in degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Orthopaedic Surgery, 2021, 13(7), 2034-2042. DOI: 10.1111/os.13138

[19]Barrey C, Roussouly P, Perrin G, Le Huec JC. Sagittal balance disorders in severe degenerative spine. Can we identify the compensatory mechanisms? European Spine Journal, 2011, 20 Suppl 5(Suppl 5), 626-633. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1930-3

[20]Imai N, Suzuki H, Sakagami A, Hirano Y, Endo N. Correlation of the anatomical sacral slope with pelvic incidence in female patients with developmental hip dysplasia: A retrospective cross-sectional study. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 2020, 15(1), 486. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-02022-9

[21]Bao T, Wang C, Wang Y, Wang T, Zhang Q, Gao F, et al. Relationship between paravertebral muscle degeneration and spinal-pelvic sagittal parameters in patients with lumbar disc herniation. Scientific Reports, 2024, 14(1), 192. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-50836-4

[22]Diebo BG, Shah NV, Boachie-Adjei O, Zhu F, Rothenfluh DA, Paulino CB, et al. Adult spinal deformity. Lancet, 2019, 394(10193), 160-172. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(19)31125-0

[23]Vialle R, Levassor N, Rillardon L, Templier A, Skalli W, Guigui P. Radiographic analysis of the sagittal alignment and balance of the spine in asymptomatic subjects. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 2005, 87(2), 260-267. DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.d.02043

Downloads

Published

2025-12-22

Issue

Section

Articles